IONS Library

Publications Scholarly Papers

Predicting the unpredictable: Critical analysis and practical implications of predictive anticipatory activity

Predicting the unpredictable: Critical analysis and practical implications of predictive anticipatory activity

by John Ives, Wayne B. Jonas, MD, Julia Mossbridge, Dean Radin, PhD, Patrizio E. Tressoldi, and Jessica Utts

Mossbridge J, Tressoldi PE, Utts J, Ives J, Radin D and Jonas W (2014) Predicting the unpredictable: Critical analysis and practical implications of predictive anticipatory activity. Front. Hum. Neurosci. | doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00146

Front. Hum. Neurosci. | doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00146 - See more at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00146/abstract#sthash.BEyodCzD.dpuf
Front. Hum. Neurosci. | doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00146 - See more at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00146/abstract#sthash.BEyodCzD.dpuf

A recent meta-analysis of experiments from seven independent laboratories (n=26) published since 1978 indicates that the human body can apparently detect randomly delivered stimuli occurring 1-10 seconds in the future. The key observation in these studies is that human physiology appears to be able to distinguish between unpredictable dichotomous future stimuli, such as emotional vs. neutral images or sound vs. silence. This phenomenon has been called presentiment (as in "feeling the future"). In this paper we call it predictive anticipatory activity or PAA. The phenomenon is "predictive" because it can distinguish between upcoming stimuli; it is "anticipatory" because the physiological changes occur before a future event; and it is an "activity" because it involves changes in the cardiopulmonary, skin, and/or nervous systems.

PAA is an unconscious phenomenon that seems to be a time-reversed reflection of the usual physiological response to a stimulus. It appears to resemble precognition (consciously knowing something is going to happen before it does), but PAA specifically refers to unconscious physiological reactions as opposed to conscious premonitions. Though it is possible that PAA underlies the conscious experience of precognition, experiments testing this idea have not produced clear results.

The first part of this paper reviews the evidence for PAA and examines the two most difficult challenges for obtaining valid evidence for it: expectation bias and multiple analyses. The second part speculates on possible mechanisms and the theoretical implications of PAA for understanding physiology and consciousness. The third part examines potential practical applications.

Online Abstract/Provisional PDF Link

 


Publication Date:
February 2014
Length:
20 pages
  • Bookmark and Share

Stay in touch with IONS